SUJIT SINGH DEBASISH GHOSH vs C.E.S.C. LTD. — WPA/10839/2005

Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: WBCHCA0229082005

Filing Number

WPA/22908/2005

Filing Date

19-May-2005

Registration No

WPA/10839/2005

Registration Date

19-May-2005

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Connection/Disconnection ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUJIT SINGH DEBASISH GHOSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.C.E.S.C. LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

    The court dismissed WPA 10839/2005 for default on June 16, 2026, after neither party appeared despite adequate notice and the matter being on the Warning List. The dismissal was also prompted by the Department's report that case records were untraceable in all available systems including CIS and movement registers. All interim orders were vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Old Matter

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Old Matter 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  5. 12-Jun-2026

    Old Matter 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  6. 11-Jun-2026

    Old Matter 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  7. 10-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-May-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/10839/2005

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed WPA 10839/2005 for default on June 16, 2026, after neither party appeared despite adequate notice and the matter being on the Warning List. The dismissal was also prompted by the Department's report that case records were untraceable in all available systems including CIS and movement registers. All interim orders were vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case