PUTUL BAG DEBASISH DAS vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/11709/2026

Case under West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0228592026

Filing Number

WPA/11563/2026

Filing Date

20-May-2026

Registration No

WPA/11709/2026

Registration Date

20-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUTUL BAG DEBASISH DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra GhoshView PDF

    Case Summary: WPA 11709/2026 The court directed the Block Development Officer, Dantan-II Block to consider and dispose of petitioner Putul Bag's representation (dated April 21, 2026) within four weeks, granting all parties reasonable hearing opportunity. The petitioner claimed to be the recorded land owner and alleged the Gram Panchayat Pradhan was constructing a pacca road by encroaching upon her land without notice or land acquisition. The court ordered a construction halt on the petitioner's land pending representation disposal and disposed of the writ petition without cost orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  4. 12-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/11709/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA 11709/2026 The court directed the Block Development Officer, Dantan-II Block to consider and dispose of petitioner Putul Bag's representation (dated April 21, 2026) within four weeks, granting all parties reasonable hearing opportunity. The petitioner claimed to be the recorded land owner and alleged the Gram Panchayat Pradhan was constructing a pacca road by encroaching upon her land without notice or land acquisition. The court ordered a construction halt on the petitioner's land pending representation disposal and disposed of the writ petition without cost orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case