ICICI HOME FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED VIVEK SAHA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/11751/2026

Case under Sarfaesi Act ,2002 Section NA. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Next hearing 24-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0227962026

Filing Number

WPA/11528/2026

Filing Date

20-May-2026

Registration No

WPA/11751/2026

Registration Date

20-May-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Residuary ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Sarfaesi Act ,2002 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ICICI HOME FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED VIVEK SAHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

  2. 2.THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDUCIAL MAGISTRATE ACT BARUIPUR

  3. 3.KALIDAS DEBNATH

  4. 4.SARMISTHA DEBNATH

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    New Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

    Case Summary: WPA 11751/2026 ICICI Home Finance Company Ltd. challenged state authorities' inaction in disposing a SARFAESI Act Section 14 application pending for six months before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baruipur. The High Court adjourned the matter to 24 June 2026, directed the State to file a report explaining the delay, and instructed respondents to proceed expeditiously with disposal of the application without awaiting the writ petition outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/11751/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA 11751/2026 ICICI Home Finance Company Ltd. challenged state authorities' inaction in disposing a SARFAESI Act Section 14 application pending for six months before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baruipur. The High Court adjourned the matter to 24 June 2026, directed the State to file a report explaining the delay, and instructed respondents to proceed expeditiously with disposal of the application without awaiting the writ petition outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case