ICICI HOME FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED VIVEK SAHA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/11747/2026
Case under No Act Section NA. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0227932026
Filing Number
WPA/11526/2026
Filing Date
20-May-2026
Registration No
WPA/11747/2026
Registration Date
20-May-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Residuary ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ICICI HOME FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED VIVEK SAHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
-
2.THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AT BARUIPUR,
-
3.JAMALALI PAHAR
-
4.MASKURA BIBI PAHAR
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jun-2026
New Motion 2
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF
Case Summary: WPA 11747/2026 ICICI Home Finance Company Ltd. filed a writ petition challenging the State of West Bengal's inaction in disposing of a SARFAESI Act application pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baruipur since January 29, 2026 (approximately six months). The High Court at Calcutta adjourned the matter to June 24, 2026, and directed the State to file a report explaining the unexplained delay. The court clarified that respondents may proceed expeditiously with the underlying application without waiting for the writ petition's final disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/11747/2026
Case Summary: WPA 11747/2026 ICICI Home Finance Company Ltd. filed a writ petition challenging the State of West Bengal's inaction in disposing of a SARFAESI Act application pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baruipur since January 29, 2026 (approximately six months). The High Court at Calcutta adjourned the matter to June 24, 2026, and directed the State to file a report explaining the unexplained delay. The court clarified that respondents may proceed expeditiously with the underlying application without waiting for the writ petition's final disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts