SAMINA KHATUN AND ORS SAYANTAN HAZRA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/11593/2026

Case under Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 22nd May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0227212026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

22nd May 2026

Filing Number

WPA/11490/2026

Filing Date

19-05-2026

Registration No

WPA/11593/2026

Registration Date

19-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SUVRA GHOSH

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SUVRA GHOSH

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

ELECTION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

22nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

SAMINA KHATUN AND ORS SAYANTAN HAZRA

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SUVRA GHOSH

22-05-2026

NEW MOTION

22-05-2026

NEW MOTION

Orders

22-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SUVRA GHOSH

The court disposed of the writ petition filed by Samina Khatun and others, members of Pardeonapur Sovapur Gram Panchayat, who challenged the prescribed authority's (6th respondent's) inaction on no-confidence motions against the Pradhan and Upapradhan submitted on May 12, 2026. The court directed the 6th respondent to take necessary steps in accordance with Section 12 of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973, within the prescribed time limit. No costs were awarded, and the allegations in the petition were deemed not admitted as no affidavit was invited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the writ petition filed by Samina Khatun and others, members of Pardeonapur Sovapur Gram Panchayat, who challenged the prescribed authority's (6th respondent's) inaction on no-confidence motions against the Pradhan and Upapradhan submitted on May 12, 2026. The court directed the 6th respondent to take necessary steps in accordance with Section 12 of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973, within the prescribed time limit. No costs were awarded, and the allegations in the petition were deemed not admitted as no affidavit was invited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case