SAMINA KHATUN AND ORS SAYANTAN HAZRA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/11593/2026
Case under Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 22nd May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0227212026
Filing Number
WPA/11490/2026
Filing Date
19-May-2026
Registration No
WPA/11593/2026
Registration Date
19-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
ELECTION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
22-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAMINA KHATUN AND ORS SAYANTAN HAZRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Suvra GhoshView PDF
The court disposed of the writ petition filed by Samina Khatun and others, members of Pardeonapur Sovapur Gram Panchayat, who challenged the prescribed authority's (6th respondent's) inaction on no-confidence motions against the Pradhan and Upapradhan submitted on May 12, 2026. The court directed the 6th respondent to take necessary steps in accordance with Section 12 of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973, within the prescribed time limit. No costs were awarded, and the allegations in the petition were deemed not admitted as no affidavit was invited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-May-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
19-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/11593/2026
The court disposed of the writ petition filed by Samina Khatun and others, members of Pardeonapur Sovapur Gram Panchayat, who challenged the prescribed authority's (6th respondent's) inaction on no-confidence motions against the Pradhan and Upapradhan submitted on May 12, 2026. The court directed the 6th respondent to take necessary steps in accordance with Section 12 of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973, within the prescribed time limit. No costs were awarded, and the allegations in the petition were deemed not admitted as no affidavit was invited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts