KAMAL KANTI DUTTA MAHABOOB AHMED vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA(P)/249/2026

Case under West Bengal Excise Act ,1909 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0227192026

Filing Number

WPA(P)/252/2026

Filing Date

19-May-2026

Registration No

WPA(P)/249/2026

Registration Date

20-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Sen

Coram

Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Sen

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Public Interest Litigation ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Excise Act ,1909 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMAL KANTI DUTTA MAHABOOB AHMED

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul,hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi SenView PDF

    Case Summary: WPA(P) 249/2026 The West Bengal High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing Respondent No. 3 authority to formally consider the petitioner's November 14, 2025 representation opposing a liquor shop license within 30 working days, after providing a hearing to the petitioner and stakeholders. The court clarified it had not decided the merits, leaving all substantive issues for the authority's reasoned determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Sen

  4. 19-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA(P)/249/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA(P) 249/2026 The West Bengal High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing Respondent No. 3 authority to formally consider the petitioner's November 14, 2025 representation opposing a liquor shop license within 30 working days, after providing a hearing to the petitioner and stakeholders. The court clarified it had not decided the merits, leaving all substantive issues for the authority's reasoned determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case