KOLKATA WOMES CLINIC REP BY ITS JT DIR., PARTHA RANJAN DAS PIYALI PAUL vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA /10601/2022

Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 18th July 2025.

CNR: WBCHCA0226802022

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

17th June 2022

Filing Number

WPA /10638/2022

Filing Date

14-06-2022

Registration No

WPA /10601/2022

Registration Date

14-06-2022

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Residuary ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

18th July 2025

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Acts & Sections

NO ACT Section NA

Petitioner(s)

KOLKATA WOMES CLINIC REP BY ITS JT DIR., PARTHA RANJAN DAS PIYALI PAUL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO

17-06-2022

NEW MOTION

06-02-2026

ADJOURNED MOTION

05-02-2026

ADJOURNED MOTION

18-07-2025

RETURNABLE MOTION

17-07-2025

RETURNABLE MOTION

Orders

25-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO

Summary The Calcutta High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Kolkata Women's Clinic against the West Bengal Clinical Establishment Regulatory Commission's order. The court declined to interfere with the Commission's decision to constitute an expert committee to investigate the matter, holding that factual disputes regarding whether the petitioner voluntarily undertook to refund ₹70,000 cannot be decided in a writ application and must be resolved before the Commission itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Calcutta High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Kolkata Women's Clinic against the West Bengal Clinical Establishment Regulatory Commission's order. The court declined to interfere with the Commission's decision to constitute an expert committee to investigate the matter, holding that factual disputes regarding whether the petitioner voluntarily undertook to refund ₹70,000 cannot be decided in a writ application and must be resolved before the Commission itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case