KOLKATA WOMES CLINIC REP BY ITS JT DIR., PARTHA RANJAN DAS PIYALI PAUL vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA /10601/2022
Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 18th July 2025.
CNR: WBCHCA0226802022
Next Hearing
17th June 2022
Filing Number
WPA /10638/2022
Filing Date
14-06-2022
Registration No
WPA /10601/2022
Registration Date
14-06-2022
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Residuary ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
18th July 2025
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KOLKATA WOMES CLINIC REP BY ITS JT DIR., PARTHA RANJAN DAS PIYALI PAUL
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO
NEW MOTION
ADJOURNED MOTION
ADJOURNED MOTION
RETURNABLE MOTION
RETURNABLE MOTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-06-2022 | NEW MOTION | |
| 06-02-2026 | ADJOURNED MOTION | |
| 05-02-2026 | ADJOURNED MOTION | |
| 18-07-2025 | RETURNABLE MOTION | |
| 17-07-2025 | RETURNABLE MOTION |
Orders
Summary The Calcutta High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Kolkata Women's Clinic against the West Bengal Clinical Establishment Regulatory Commission's order. The court declined to interfere with the Commission's decision to constitute an expert committee to investigate the matter, holding that factual disputes regarding whether the petitioner voluntarily undertook to refund ₹70,000 cannot be decided in a writ application and must be resolved before the Commission itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Calcutta High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Kolkata Women's Clinic against the West Bengal Clinical Establishment Regulatory Commission's order. The court declined to interfere with the Commission's decision to constitute an expert committee to investigate the matter, holding that factual disputes regarding whether the petitioner voluntarily undertook to refund ₹70,000 cannot be decided in a writ application and must be resolved before the Commission itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts