JAHURA BIBI AND ORS NIKHIL KUMAR GUPTA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/11518/2026
Case under West Bengal Police Act ,1861 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 26th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0224212026
Filing Number
WPA/11367/2026
Filing Date
18-May-2026
Registration No
WPA/11518/2026
Registration Date
18-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Sen
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Sen
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
POLICE INACTION/ACTION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
26-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAHURA BIBI AND ORS NIKHIL KUMAR GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi SenView PDF
The Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable. Petitioners sought a writ directing police to register an FIR based on a written complaint dated 18.04.2026 alleging violation of a civil court injunction. The court held that the proper remedy for grievances regarding FIR registration or investigation is to approach the Magistrate under Section 156(3) CrPC, not file a writ petition under Article 226, following Supreme Court precedent and the court's own Division Bench decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Saugata BhattacharyyaView PDF
-
22-May-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
-
18-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/11518/2026
The Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable. Petitioners sought a writ directing police to register an FIR based on a written complaint dated 18.04.2026 alleging violation of a civil court injunction. The court held that the proper remedy for grievances regarding FIR registration or investigation is to approach the Magistrate under Section 156(3) CrPC, not file a writ petition under Article 226, following Supreme Court precedent and the court's own Division Bench decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts