RATAN KUMAR DEBNATH PARITOSH SINHA vs THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND ORS — WPA/11461/2026

Case under No Act Section NA. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: WBCHCA0223392026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

WPA/11327/2026

Filing Date

18-05-2026

Registration No

WPA/11461/2026

Registration Date

18-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Residuary ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Acts & Sections

No Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

RATAN KUMAR DEBNATH PARITOSH SINHA

Respondent(s)

THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND ORS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH

19-05-2026

NEW MOTION

22-05-2026

MOTION

21-05-2026

MOTION

Orders

22-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH

Case Summary: WPA 11461/2026 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED IN PART with interim relief granted. The court issued a temporary injunction restraining respondents from issuing a Letter of Intent, work order, or executing any contract for the ESI Hospital maintenance work for six weeks pending further hearing. Key Finding: The court found prima facie that petitioner Ratan Kumar Debnath's bid was wrongfully rejected. Despite submitting valid MES (Military Engineering Services) registration as a Civil and Electrical Contractor, ESIC rejected his bid claiming registration details were "not submitted." The court noted respondents' contradictory explanations during hearing and that petitioner was never informed of alleged document deficiencies, violating procedural fairness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA 11461/2026 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED IN PART with interim relief granted. The court issued a temporary injunction restraining respondents from issuing a Letter of Intent, work order, or executing any contract for the ESI Hospital maintenance work for six weeks pending further hearing. Key Finding: The court found prima facie that petitioner Ratan Kumar Debnath's bid was wrongfully rejected. Despite submitting valid MES (Military Engineering Services) registration as a Civil and Electrical Contractor, ESIC rejected his bid claiming registration details were "not submitted." The court noted respondents' contradictory explanations during hearing and that petitioner was never informed of alleged document deficiencies, violating procedural fairness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case