RATAN KUMAR DEBNATH PARITOSH SINHA vs THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND ORS — WPA/11461/2026
Case under No Act Section NA. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: WBCHCA0223392026
Filing Number
WPA/11327/2026
Filing Date
18-May-2026
Registration No
WPA/11461/2026
Registration Date
18-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Residuary ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RATAN KUMAR DEBNATH PARITOSH SINHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND ORS
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
22-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Gaurang KanthView PDF
Case Summary: WPA 11461/2026 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED IN PART with interim relief granted. The court issued a temporary injunction restraining respondents from issuing a Letter of Intent, work order, or executing any contract for the ESI Hospital maintenance work for six weeks pending further hearing. Key Finding: The court found prima facie that petitioner Ratan Kumar Debnath's bid was wrongfully rejected. Despite submitting valid MES (Military Engineering Services) registration as a Civil and Electrical Contractor, ESIC rejected his bid claiming registration details were "not submitted." The court noted respondents' contradictory explanations during hearing and that petitioner was never informed of alleged document deficiencies, violating procedural fairness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-May-2026
Motion
Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth
-
21-May-2026
Motion
Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth
-
19-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Gaurang KanthView PDF
-
19-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/11461/2026
Case Summary: WPA 11461/2026 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED IN PART with interim relief granted. The court issued a temporary injunction restraining respondents from issuing a Letter of Intent, work order, or executing any contract for the ESI Hospital maintenance work for six weeks pending further hearing. Key Finding: The court found prima facie that petitioner Ratan Kumar Debnath's bid was wrongfully rejected. Despite submitting valid MES (Military Engineering Services) registration as a Civil and Electrical Contractor, ESIC rejected his bid claiming registration details were "not submitted." The court noted respondents' contradictory explanations during hearing and that petitioner was never informed of alleged document deficiencies, violating procedural fairness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts