ASURA BIBI RABI KUMAR SAH vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR/2108/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 22nd May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-May-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0223132026

Filing Number

CRR/2091/2026

Filing Date

18-May-2026

Registration No

CRR/2108/2026

Registration Date

18-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee

Coram

Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Maintenance Proceeding ( 61 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

22-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASURA BIBI RABI KUMAR SAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

  2. 2.SEKHANDAR ALI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-May-2026

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar MukherjeeView PDF

    The court allowed Asura Bibi's petition for expeditious disposal of the maintenance execution case. The petitioner was awarded Rs. 5,000 monthly maintenance by court order in July 2024, but the husband failed to pay, resulting in arrears of Rs. 2,25,000. The High Court directed the trial court to conclude the execution proceeding within 3 months, recognizing the petitioner's justified need for timely justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-May-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee

  4. 18-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/2108/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Asura Bibi's petition for expeditious disposal of the maintenance execution case. The petitioner was awarded Rs. 5,000 monthly maintenance by court order in July 2024, but the husband failed to pay, resulting in arrears of Rs. 2,25,000. The High Court directed the trial court to conclude the execution proceeding within 3 months, recognizing the petitioner's justified need for timely justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case