DESRAJ AGARWAL AND OTHERS SMITA MUKHERJEE vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR/2071/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0221512026
Filing Number
CRR/2065/2026
Filing Date
15-May-2026
Registration No
CRR/2071/2026
Registration Date
15-May-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Quashing of Proceedings ( 75 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DESRAJ AGARWAL AND OTHERS SMITA MUKHERJEE
-
2.PREMLATA AGARWAL
-
3.PREETI BERIWAL
-
4.UMESH BERIWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
-
2.LISA AGARWAL
Case History
-
06-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Jul-2026
New Motion 1
Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
-
19-May-2026
Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar MukherjeeView PDF
Case Summary: CRR 2071/2026 The petitioners sought quashing of criminal proceedings (GR Case No. 695 of 2024) arising from a dowry-related FIR registered at Kharagpur All Women Police Station. The lower court's order dated 25.03.2026 took cognizance under different sections (126(1)/115(2)/74/79/351(2)/3(5) BNS) than those in the chargesheet (85/115(2)/79/316(2)/3(5) BNS), with no corresponding allegations or investigation. The High Court admitted the petition, finding apparent anomaly in the cognizance order, and stayed the impugned order for twelve weeks. The matter was listed for July 2026 as a contested application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRR/2071/2026
Case Summary: CRR 2071/2026 The petitioners sought quashing of criminal proceedings (GR Case No. 695 of 2024) arising from a dowry-related FIR registered at Kharagpur All Women Police Station. The lower court's order dated 25.03.2026 took cognizance under different sections (126(1)/115(2)/74/79/351(2)/3(5) BNS) than those in the chargesheet (85/115(2)/79/316(2)/3(5) BNS), with no corresponding allegations or investigation. The High Court admitted the petition, finding apparent anomaly in the cognizance order, and stayed the impugned order for twelve weeks. The matter was listed for July 2026 as a contested application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts