ASHALATA BISWAS AND OTHERS KUNAL GANGULY vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR/2073/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: WBCHCA0220892026

Filing Number

CRR/2055/2026

Filing Date

15-May-2026

Registration No

CRR/2073/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Quashing of Proceedings ( 75 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528
Indian Penal Code Act ,1860 Section 420/323/325/120B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHALATA BISWAS AND OTHERS KUNAL GANGULY

  2. 2.SANTOSH BISWAS

  3. 3.RUPALI BISWAS

  4. 4.SOVA MANDAL @ BISWAS

  5. 5.BHUSAN MANDAL @ BHUBAN MONDAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

  2. 2.KALU BISWAS

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Kausik ChandaView PDF

    Summary of CRR 2073/2026 The court granted a stay of all proceedings in Tehatta Police Station Case No. 864 of 2023 (GR 8972/2023) involving charges under IPC Sections 420/323/325/120B for twelve weeks. The dispute arose over compensation awarded for the death of Rakesh Biswas, which was credited to petitioner no. 1 (the deceased's grandmother who raised him). The court found the dispute to be civil in nature and scheduled a contested hearing after six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-May-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Kausik Chanda

  4. 15-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/2073/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRR 2073/2026 The court granted a stay of all proceedings in Tehatta Police Station Case No. 864 of 2023 (GR 8972/2023) involving charges under IPC Sections 420/323/325/120B for twelve weeks. The dispute arose over compensation awarded for the death of Rakesh Biswas, which was credited to petitioner no. 1 (the deceased's grandmother who raised him). The court found the dispute to be civil in nature and scheduled a contested hearing after six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case