AMIT KR. UPADDHYAY & ANR. PARTHA PRATIM MUKHERJEE vs CESC LTD. — WPA/10411/2005

Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: WBCHCA0220232005

Filing Number

WPA/22023/2005

Filing Date

16-May-2005

Registration No

WPA/10411/2005

Registration Date

16-May-2005

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Connection/Disconnection ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMIT KR. UPADDHYAY & ANR. PARTHA PRATIM MUKHERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CESC LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

    The Writ Petition (WPA No. 10411 of 2005) filed by Amit Kr. Upaddhyay and another against CESC Ltd. was dismissed for default on June 16, 2026, as neither party appeared despite sufficient notice and the matter being listed for hearing. The court found that case records were untraceable in departmental systems, CIS, and registers, necessitating dismissal and vacation of any interim orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Jun-2026

    Old Matter

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  5. 15-Jun-2026

    Old Matter 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  6. 12-Jun-2026

    Old Matter 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  7. 11-Jun-2026

    Old Matter 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  8. 10-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 16-May-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/10411/2005

casestatus.in Summary

The Writ Petition (WPA No. 10411 of 2005) filed by Amit Kr. Upaddhyay and another against CESC Ltd. was dismissed for default on June 16, 2026, as neither party appeared despite sufficient notice and the matter being listed for hearing. The court found that case records were untraceable in departmental systems, CIS, and registers, necessitating dismissal and vacation of any interim orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case