SREI Equipment Finance Limited RUPJAANI SEN vs Gayatri Granites — AO-COM/22/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Nil. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0220152026
Next Hearing
19th May 2026
e-Filing Number
14-05-2026
Filing Number
AO-COM/22/2026
Filing Date
14-05-2026
Registration No
AO-COM/22/2026
Registration Date
15-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 57 )
Judicial Branch
STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION
Decision Date
19th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SREI Equipment Finance Limited RUPJAANI SEN
Respondent(s)
Gayatri Granites
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: AO-COM 22/2026 The Calcutta High Court set aside ex parte interim injunction orders obtained by Gayatri Granites in two specific performance suits against SREI Equipment Finance Limited. The court found that Gayatri Granites, as the plaintiff seeking specific performance of settlement memoranda requiring payment of agreed amounts, failed to establish readiness and willingness to perform its contractual obligations, as it had not paid the full amounts due. The court held that this failure was fatal to the plaintiff's case, making the balance of convenience and prima facie case questions immaterial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: AO-COM 22/2026 The Calcutta High Court set aside ex parte interim injunction orders obtained by Gayatri Granites in two specific performance suits against SREI Equipment Finance Limited. The court found that Gayatri Granites, as the plaintiff seeking specific performance of settlement memoranda requiring payment of agreed amounts, failed to establish readiness and willingness to perform its contractual obligations, as it had not paid the full amounts due. The court held that this failure was fatal to the plaintiff's case, making the balance of convenience and prima facie case questions immaterial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts