SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED RUPJAANI SEN vs GAYATRI GRANITES INDUSTRIES — AO-COM/21/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Nil. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0220132026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

19th May 2026

e-Filing Number

14-05-2026

Filing Number

AO-COM/21/2026

Filing Date

14-05-2026

Registration No

AO-COM/21/2026

Registration Date

15-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Decision Date

19th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Nil

Petitioner(s)

SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED RUPJAANI SEN

Respondent(s)

GAYATRI GRANITES INDUSTRIES

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI

19-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

19-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK,HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI

The Calcutta High Court set aside six appeals and vacated ex parte injunction orders that had restricted SREI Equipment Finance Limited from terminating settlement agreements with Gayatri Granites Industries. The court found that Gayatri Granites, as plaintiff in the specific performance suits, failed to establish readiness and willingness to perform its contractual obligations—specifically, it had not paid the agreed settlement amounts to SREI—rendering it ineligible for specific performance relief under established legal principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court set aside six appeals and vacated ex parte injunction orders that had restricted SREI Equipment Finance Limited from terminating settlement agreements with Gayatri Granites Industries. The court found that Gayatri Granites, as plaintiff in the specific performance suits, failed to establish readiness and willingness to perform its contractual obligations—specifically, it had not paid the agreed settlement amounts to SREI—rendering it ineligible for specific performance relief under established legal principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Code of Civil Procedure All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case