SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED RUPJAANI SEN vs GAYATRI GRANITES INDUSTRIES — AO-COM/21/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Nil. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0220132026
e-Filing Number
14-05-2026
Filing Number
AO-COM/21/2026
Filing Date
14-May-2026
Registration No
AO-COM/21/2026
Registration Date
15-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 57 )
Judicial Branch
STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION
Decision Date
19-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED RUPJAANI SEN
Respondent(s)
-
1.GAYATRI GRANITES INDUSTRIES
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak,hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar RashidiView PDF
The Calcutta High Court set aside six appeals and vacated ex parte injunction orders that had restricted SREI Equipment Finance Limited from terminating settlement agreements with Gayatri Granites Industries. The court found that Gayatri Granites, as plaintiff in the specific performance suits, failed to establish readiness and willingness to perform its contractual obligations—specifically, it had not paid the agreed settlement amounts to SREI—rendering it ineligible for specific performance relief under established legal principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-May-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi
-
14-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. AO-COM/21/2026
The Calcutta High Court set aside six appeals and vacated ex parte injunction orders that had restricted SREI Equipment Finance Limited from terminating settlement agreements with Gayatri Granites Industries. The court found that Gayatri Granites, as plaintiff in the specific performance suits, failed to establish readiness and willingness to perform its contractual obligations—specifically, it had not paid the agreed settlement amounts to SREI—rendering it ineligible for specific performance relief under established legal principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts