UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARIJIT MAJUMDAR vs SARIFUL KHATUN (BIBI) AND ORS — WP.CT/104/2026
Case under Administrative Tribunals Act Section NA. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0217882026
e-Filing Number
13-05-2026
Filing Number
WP.CT/98/2026
Filing Date
13-May-2026
Registration No
WP.CT/104/2026
Registration Date
13-May-2026
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
APPOINTMENT ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARIJIT MAJUMDAR
-
2.The General Manager
Adv. ARIJIT MAJUMDAR
-
3.The Principal Chief Personnel Officer
Adv. ARIJIT MAJUMDAR
-
4.The Divisional Railway Manager
Adv. ARIJIT MAJUMDAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.SARIFUL KHATUN (BIBI) AND ORS
-
2.Mabia Khatun
-
3.Amjad Khan
-
4.Mrinmayee Santra Maity
-
5.Chanda Das Adhikary Patra
-
6.Ranajit Samanta
Case History
-
06-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Jul-2026
Tribunal Motion
Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Sen
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul,hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi SenView PDF
Case Summary - WP.CT/104/2026 The case between Union of India & Ors. vs. Sariful Khatun (Bibi) & Ors. was adjourned on 10.06.2026. The court granted the respondents' request for accommodation due to bereavement in their counsel's family. The matter was rescheduled to the July 2026 monthly list, and respondents were directed to refrain from proceeding with their contempt application before the tribunal until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP.CT/104/2026
Case Summary - WP.CT/104/2026 The case between Union of India & Ors. vs. Sariful Khatun (Bibi) & Ors. was adjourned on 10.06.2026. The court granted the respondents' request for accommodation due to bereavement in their counsel's family. The matter was rescheduled to the July 2026 monthly list, and respondents were directed to refrain from proceeding with their contempt application before the tribunal until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts