ARPITA BANERJEE SUBHAJIT CHOWDHURY vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRR/2017/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482/483. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-May-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0216642026

Filing Number

CRR/2003/2026

Filing Date

13-May-2026

Registration No

CRR/2017/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee

Coram

Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Exercise of inherent power u/s 482 Cr. P. C. ( 40 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

19-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482/483
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528/529
Indian Penal Code Act ,1860 Section 341/323/354/506/34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARPITA BANERJEE SUBHAJIT CHOWDHURY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar MukherjeeView PDF

    The High Court allowed Arpita Banerjee's petition challenging inordinate delay in G.R. Case No. 3195 of 2015 (IPC Sections 341/323/354/506/34), which remained pending for 11 years with no witness examination despite charge framing in December 2019. The court directed the subordinate court to dispose of the pending Commissioner application within 30 days and conclude the entire proceeding within six months, finding the delay unjustified and prejudicial to justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-May-2026

    New Motion 2

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee

  4. 15-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/2017/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court allowed Arpita Banerjee's petition challenging inordinate delay in G.R. Case No. 3195 of 2015 (IPC Sections 341/323/354/506/34), which remained pending for 11 years with no witness examination despite charge framing in December 2019. The court directed the subordinate court to dispose of the pending Commissioner application within 30 days and conclude the entire proceeding within six months, finding the delay unjustified and prejudicial to justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case