RAVI KUMAR GUPTA @ KARU SOUMYA BASU ROY CHOWDHURI vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(M)/1201/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0216432026
Filing Number
CRM(M)/1168/2026
Filing Date
13-May-2026
Registration No
CRM(M)/1201/2026
Registration Date
14-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAVI KUMAR GUPTA @ KARU SOUMYA BASU ROY CHOWDHURI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar GhoshView PDF
The court granted bail to Ravi Kumar Gupta @ Karu in a criminal case involving dacoity and Arms Act violations. The petitioner, who had been in custody for over four years four months, was released on bail of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, noting he was similarly situated to a co-accused who had already been granted bail and that trial proceedings had progressed minimally with only 7 of 69 witnesses examined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
New Bail Application
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
12-Jun-2026
New Bail Application
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
11-Jun-2026
New Bail Application
Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)
-
05-Jun-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)
-
19-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(M)/1201/2026
The court granted bail to Ravi Kumar Gupta @ Karu in a criminal case involving dacoity and Arms Act violations. The petitioner, who had been in custody for over four years four months, was released on bail of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, noting he was similarly situated to a co-accused who had already been granted bail and that trial proceedings had progressed minimally with only 7 of 69 witnesses examined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts