FLEMINGO DUTYFREE SHOP PRIVATE LIMITED NASRIN SULTANA vs AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR — WPA/10962/2026
Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 19th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0211902026
Filing Number
WPA/10827/2026
Filing Date
08-May-2026
Registration No
WPA/10962/2026
Registration Date
08-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Residuary ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
19-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FLEMINGO DUTYFREE SHOP PRIVATE LIMITED NASRIN SULTANA
Respondent(s)
-
1.AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR
-
2.NUANCE GROUP (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED
-
3.NUANCE GROUP(INDIA) PVT. LTD.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Gaurang KanthView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: WPA 10962/2026 The Calcutta High Court dismissed Flemingo Dutyfree Shop's writ petition challenging the tender evaluation process for duty-free outlets at Kolkata airport. The court found no arbitrariness, mala fides, or patent illegality in the Airport Authority's decision to permit Nuance Group to resubmit deficient documents or its deviation from the CPP Portal for communications. The court held that the RFP's Clause 7.8.5 expressly authorized seeking clarifications, that the same procedure was uniformly applied to all bidders, and that judicial intervention in procurement decisions requires demonstrating palpable impropriety—a threshold not met here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Gaurang KanthView PDF
-
13-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-May-2026
Motion
Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth
-
12-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Gaurang KanthView PDF
-
08-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/10962/2026
CASE SUMMARY: WPA 10962/2026 The Calcutta High Court dismissed Flemingo Dutyfree Shop's writ petition challenging the tender evaluation process for duty-free outlets at Kolkata airport. The court found no arbitrariness, mala fides, or patent illegality in the Airport Authority's decision to permit Nuance Group to resubmit deficient documents or its deviation from the CPP Portal for communications. The court held that the RFP's Clause 7.8.5 expressly authorized seeking clarifications, that the same procedure was uniformly applied to all bidders, and that judicial intervention in procurement decisions requires demonstrating palpable impropriety—a threshold not met here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts