NIRMAL KUMAR MANDAL AND ORS ABHINABA DAN vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/10969/2026

Case under West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-May-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0211852026

Filing Number

WPA/10826/2026

Filing Date

08-May-2026

Registration No

WPA/10969/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NIRMAL KUMAR MANDAL AND ORS ABHINABA DAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra GhoshView PDF

    The court dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable, finding the dispute to be essentially civil in nature. Petitioners alleged that respondents, though authorized to construct on plot 611 under Pradhan Mantri Abash Yojona/Banglar Bari Prokalpo Scheme, encroached on petitioners' adjacent plots (609, 610, 612). The court directed petitioners to pursue remedies through appropriate civil forums instead of writ jurisdiction, with no cost order imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  4. 18-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra GhoshView PDF

  5. 18-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/10969/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable, finding the dispute to be essentially civil in nature. Petitioners alleged that respondents, though authorized to construct on plot 611 under Pradhan Mantri Abash Yojona/Banglar Bari Prokalpo Scheme, encroached on petitioners' adjacent plots (609, 610, 612). The court directed petitioners to pursue remedies through appropriate civil forums instead of writ jurisdiction, with no cost order imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case