SOMNATH ROY JYOTI AGARWAL vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/10947/2026

Case under West Bengal Highways Act ,1964 Section NA. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Next hearing 10-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0211312026

Filing Number

WPA/10808/2026

Filing Date

08-May-2026

Registration No

WPA/10947/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

UNAUTHORISED OCCUPATION ( 13 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Highways Act ,1964 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SOMNATH ROY JYOTI AGARWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    New Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay BhattacharyyaView PDF

    Case Summary: WPA 10947/2026 The court admitted the writ petition challenging a Sub-Divisional Magistrate's order under the West Bengal Highways Act, 1964, despite the State's objection regarding alternative remedies. The petitioner alleged gross violation of natural justice principles, specifically that land demarcation work was conducted without his knowledge and no demarcation report was provided before the hearing. The court found *prima facie* merit in this contention and decided to entertain the petition. The matter was adjourned to June 10, 2026, for the State counsel to seek further instructions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 20-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 08-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/10947/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA 10947/2026 The court admitted the writ petition challenging a Sub-Divisional Magistrate's order under the West Bengal Highways Act, 1964, despite the State's objection regarding alternative remedies. The petitioner alleged gross violation of natural justice principles, specifically that land demarcation work was conducted without his knowledge and no demarcation report was provided before the hearing. The court found *prima facie* merit in this contention and decided to entertain the petition. The matter was adjourned to June 10, 2026, for the State counsel to seek further instructions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case