ASHOK GANGULY AND ANR. SAIKAT KOLEY vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR/2033/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 401/482. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 13th April 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0209592025

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

14th May 2025

Filing Number

CRR/2000/2025

Filing Date

06-05-2025

Registration No

CRR/2033/2025

Registration Date

06-05-2025

Judge

HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE

Coram

HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Quashing of Proceedings ( 75 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

13th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 401/482
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438/442/443
Indian Penal Code Act ,1860 Section 147/341/323/504

Petitioner(s)

ASHOK GANGULY AND ANR. SAIKAT KOLEY

MITALI GANGULY

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

RENUKA GANGULY

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE

14-05-2025

NEW MOTION

06-04-2026

UPGRADED MATTERS

30-03-2026

UPGRADED MATTERS

23-03-2026

UPGRADED MATTERS

18-03-2026

UPGRADED MATTERS

Orders

13-04-2026
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE

Summary The Calcutta High Court allowed the petition for expeditious disposal of G.R. Case No. 1425 of 2013, which had been pending since 2013 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Serampore. The court found the petitioners' prayer justified due to the prolonged pendency (only 2 of 8 prosecution witnesses examined in over 12 years) and directed the lower court to conclude the trial preferably within six months, invoking jurisdiction under Section 529 of the BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Calcutta High Court allowed the petition for expeditious disposal of G.R. Case No. 1425 of 2013, which had been pending since 2013 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Serampore. The court found the petitioners' prayer justified due to the prolonged pendency (only 2 of 8 prosecution witnesses examined in over 12 years) and directed the lower court to conclude the trial preferably within six months, invoking jurisdiction under Section 529 of the BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case