CESC LIMITED VAIBHAVI PANDEY vs COAL INDIA LIMITED AND ANR — WPA/10773/2026

Case under No Act Section NA. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Next hearing 25-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0207882026

Filing Number

WPA/10654/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

WPA/10773/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Residuary ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CESC LIMITED VAIBHAVI PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COAL INDIA LIMITED AND ANR

  2. 2.EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Jun-2026

    Urgent Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Krishna Rao

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Krishna RaoView PDF

    Case Summary: WPA 10773/2026 Outcome: Interim stay granted. The court restrained Coal India Limited and Eastern Coalfields Limited from enforcing a Rs. 9-crore demand notice against CESC Limited until June 25, 2026. The court found CESC made a prima facie case and that power supply disruption to Kolkata and Howrah districts would result if the interim order was not granted. Respondents must file affidavits-in-opposition within four weeks, with replies due two weeks thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/10773/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA 10773/2026 Outcome: Interim stay granted. The court restrained Coal India Limited and Eastern Coalfields Limited from enforcing a Rs. 9-crore demand notice against CESC Limited until June 25, 2026. The court found CESC made a prima facie case and that power supply disruption to Kolkata and Howrah districts would result if the interim order was not granted. Respondents must file affidavits-in-opposition within four weeks, with replies due two weeks thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case