ANIRBAN DAS DEBLINA DE vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR/1914/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482/401. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0207112026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

11th May 2026

Filing Number

CRR/1894/2026

Filing Date

06-05-2026

Registration No

CRR/1914/2026

Registration Date

06-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE

Coram

HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Exercise of inherent power u/s 482 Cr. P. C. ( 40 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

19th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482/401
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528/442
Indian Penal Code Act ,1860 Section 498A/34

Petitioner(s)

ANIRBAN DAS DEBLINA DE

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

SADHAN MONDAL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE

11-05-2026

NEW MOTION

18-05-2026

NEW MOTION 2

15-05-2026

NEW MOTION 2

14-05-2026

NEW MOTION 2

13-05-2026

NEW MOTION 2

Orders

19-05-2026
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE

Case Summary: CRR 1914/2026 The court granted the petitioner's application seeking expeditious disposal of the underlying criminal case (G.R. 103/2023) under IPC Sections 498A/34, which had experienced significant delay. The court found the petition justified given that no witnesses had been examined despite ten months passing since charge framing in September 2024, directing the lower court to conclude proceedings within six months from the next hearing date to secure ends of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRR 1914/2026 The court granted the petitioner's application seeking expeditious disposal of the underlying criminal case (G.R. 103/2023) under IPC Sections 498A/34, which had experienced significant delay. The court found the petition justified given that no witnesses had been examined despite ten months passing since charge framing in September 2024, directing the lower court to conclude proceedings within six months from the next hearing date to secure ends of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case