SUDESHNA BHATTACHARYA MONAMI MUKHERJEE vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/10718/2026

Case under Police Act ,1861 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-May-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0205952026

Filing Number

WPA/10585/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

WPA/10718/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

POLICE INACTION/ACTION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Police Act ,1861 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUDESHNA BHATTACHARYA MONAMI MUKHERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Saugata BhattacharyyaView PDF

    Case Summary: WPA 10718/2026 The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition without directing the police to add Section 82 (bigamy) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 to the criminal prosecution. However, the court permitted the investigating agency to independently consider the petitioner's complaint and investigate the case accordingly, leaving it open to the petitioner to approach the Magistrate under Section 193(9) if dissatisfied with the investigation report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya

  4. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/10718/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA 10718/2026 The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition without directing the police to add Section 82 (bigamy) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 to the criminal prosecution. However, the court permitted the investigating agency to independently consider the petitioner's complaint and investigate the case accordingly, leaving it open to the petitioner to approach the Magistrate under Section 193(9) if dissatisfied with the investigation report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case