JAINCO AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED JATINDER SINGH DHATT vs CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA — CO/1487/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 19th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0202202026
Filing Number
CO/1489/2026
Filing Date
30-Apr-2026
Registration No
CO/1487/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 57 )
Judicial Branch
RULE SECTION
Decision Date
19-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAINCO AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED JATINDER SINGH DHATT
Respondent(s)
-
1.CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan RaiView PDF
Summary of CO/1487/2026 The High Court at Calcutta dismissed Jainco Automotive's revisional petition challenging NCLT orders for alleged violations of natural justice. The court found no merit in the petitioner's claims of procedural violations, noting the petitioner had fully participated in NCLT hearings on April 2, 2026—four months after the contested December 3, 2025 cost order—without earlier objection, and failed to substantiate claims of technical glitches. The petition was dismissed with liberty to challenge any adverse NCLT judgment through appropriate forums. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-May-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
-
12-May-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
-
11-May-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
-
08-May-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
-
07-May-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
-
06-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CO/1487/2026
Summary of CO/1487/2026 The High Court at Calcutta dismissed Jainco Automotive's revisional petition challenging NCLT orders for alleged violations of natural justice. The court found no merit in the petitioner's claims of procedural violations, noting the petitioner had fully participated in NCLT hearings on April 2, 2026—four months after the contested December 3, 2025 cost order—without earlier objection, and failed to substantiate claims of technical glitches. The petition was dismissed with liberty to challenge any adverse NCLT judgment through appropriate forums. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts