JAINCO AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED JATINDER SINGH DHATT vs CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA — CO/1487/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 19th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0202202026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

06th May 2026

Filing Number

CO/1489/2026

Filing Date

30-04-2026

Registration No

CO/1487/2026

Registration Date

30-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Decision Date

19th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

JAINCO AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED JATINDER SINGH DHATT

Respondent(s)

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

06-05-2026

NEW MOTION

13-05-2026

NEW MOTION

12-05-2026

NEW MOTION

11-05-2026

NEW MOTION

08-05-2026

NEW MOTION

Orders

19-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

Summary of CO/1487/2026 The High Court at Calcutta dismissed Jainco Automotive's revisional petition challenging NCLT orders for alleged violations of natural justice. The court found no merit in the petitioner's claims of procedural violations, noting the petitioner had fully participated in NCLT hearings on April 2, 2026—four months after the contested December 3, 2025 cost order—without earlier objection, and failed to substantiate claims of technical glitches. The petition was dismissed with liberty to challenge any adverse NCLT judgment through appropriate forums. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CO/1487/2026 The High Court at Calcutta dismissed Jainco Automotive's revisional petition challenging NCLT orders for alleged violations of natural justice. The court found no merit in the petitioner's claims of procedural violations, noting the petitioner had fully participated in NCLT hearings on April 2, 2026—four months after the contested December 3, 2025 cost order—without earlier objection, and failed to substantiate claims of technical glitches. The petition was dismissed with liberty to challenge any adverse NCLT judgment through appropriate forums. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Specific Relief Act ,1963 All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case