CHITTARANJAN MAHATO TAHARIMA KHATUN vs BABA SAHEB AMBEDKAR EDUCATION UNIVERSITY AND ORS. — MAT/794/2026

Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS on 07th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0201962026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

06th May 2026

Filing Number

MAT/801/2026

Filing Date

30-04-2026

Registration No

MAT/794/2026

Registration Date

30-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE TAPABRATA CHAKRABORTY , HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI CHATTERJEE

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE TAPABRATA CHAKRABORTY , HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI CHATTERJEE

Bench Type

Division Bench

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Acts & Sections

No Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

CHITTARANJAN MAHATO TAHARIMA KHATUN

Respondent(s)

BABA SAHEB AMBEDKAR EDUCATION UNIVERSITY AND ORS.

VICE CHANCELLOR, BABA SAHEB AMBEDKAR EDUCATION UNIVERSITY

THE REGISTRAR, BABA SAHEB AMBEDKAR EDUCATION UNIVERSITY

DHARANIDHAR PATI

THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHERS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE TAPABRATA CHAKRABORTY , HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI CHATTERJEE

06-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE TAPABRATA CHAKRABORTY,HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI CHATTERJEE

The court disposed of the appeal as infructuous after finding that the interlocutory order under challenge had already been acted upon and the University had filed a compliance report. The bench condoned the delay in preferring the appeal and directed respondents to file affidavits-in-opposition within two weeks, with liberty to parties to seek further consideration before the Regular Bench after the affidavit exchange period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the appeal as infructuous after finding that the interlocutory order under challenge had already been acted upon and the University had filed a compliance report. The bench condoned the delay in preferring the appeal and directed respondents to file affidavits-in-opposition within two weeks, with liberty to parties to seek further consideration before the Regular Bench after the affidavit exchange period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case