CHITTARANJAN MAHATO TAHARIMA KHATUN vs BABA SAHEB AMBEDKAR EDUCATION UNIVERSITY AND ORS. — MAT/794/2026
Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS on 07th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0201962026
Filing Number
MAT/801/2026
Filing Date
30-Apr-2026
Registration No
MAT/794/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
Bench Type
Division Bench
Judicial Branch
STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHITTARANJAN MAHATO TAHARIMA KHATUN
Respondent(s)
-
1.BABA SAHEB AMBEDKAR EDUCATION UNIVERSITY AND ORS.
-
2.VICE CHANCELLOR, BABA SAHEB AMBEDKAR EDUCATION UNIVERSITY
-
3.THE REGISTRAR, BABA SAHEB AMBEDKAR EDUCATION UNIVERSITY
-
4.DHARANIDHAR PATI
-
5.THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty,hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi ChatterjeeView PDF
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty,hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi ChatterjeeView PDF
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty,hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi ChatterjeeView PDF
The court disposed of the appeal as infructuous after finding that the interlocutory order under challenge had already been acted upon and the University had filed a compliance report. The bench condoned the delay in preferring the appeal and directed respondents to file affidavits-in-opposition within two weeks, with liberty to parties to seek further consideration before the Regular Bench after the affidavit exchange period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
-
30-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MAT/794/2026
The court disposed of the appeal as infructuous after finding that the interlocutory order under challenge had already been acted upon and the University had filed a compliance report. The bench condoned the delay in preferring the appeal and directed respondents to file affidavits-in-opposition within two weeks, with liberty to parties to seek further consideration before the Regular Bench after the affidavit exchange period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts