S.B. COLD STORAGE INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMTIED ANISH ROY vs REGIONAL P.F. COMMISSIONER AND ANR. — WPA/10511/2026
Case under Industrial Disputes Act ,1947 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 18th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0201812026
Filing Number
WPA/10362/2026
Filing Date
30-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPA/10511/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
PROVIDENT FUND ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
18-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S.B. COLD STORAGE INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMTIED ANISH ROY
Respondent(s)
-
1.REGIONAL P.F. COMMISSIONER AND ANR.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF
Summary of WPA 10511/2026 The court stayed a recovery notice dated 24.04.2026 issued by the Regional P.F. Commissioner against S.B. Cold Storage Industries, finding it improper conduct that the authorities proceeded with recovery despite having notice of the petitioner's pending appeal before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal and despite the Tribunal lacking a regular Presiding Officer to hear the appeal. The court directed the respondent authorities to refrain from coercive action until the tribunal considers the appeal and stay application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-May-2026
New Motion (Group - III)
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF
-
07-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/10511/2026
Summary of WPA 10511/2026 The court stayed a recovery notice dated 24.04.2026 issued by the Regional P.F. Commissioner against S.B. Cold Storage Industries, finding it improper conduct that the authorities proceeded with recovery despite having notice of the petitioner's pending appeal before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal and despite the Tribunal lacking a regular Presiding Officer to hear the appeal. The court directed the respondent authorities to refrain from coercive action until the tribunal considers the appeal and stay application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts