BIRENDRA KUMAR GIRI AND ANOTHER PRIYADARSHAN KUMAR vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — CRR/1875/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397/401/482. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: WBCHCA0201802026

Filing Number

CRR/1859/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRR/1875/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Quashing of Proceedings ( 75 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397/401/482
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438/442/528
Indian Penal Code Act ,1860 Section 468/420/34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIRENDRA KUMAR GIRI AND ANOTHER PRIYADARSHAN KUMAR

  2. 2.SINESHWAR GOPE @ SIDHESHWAR PRASAD YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

  2. 2.RANJITA KAYAL

  3. 3.DILIP KAYAL

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Kausik ChandaView PDF

    Case Summary: CRR 1875 of 2026 The court stayed proceedings in the underlying criminal case (G.R. Case No. 1459 of 2022) for 12 weeks, finding prima facie evidence of a valid sale deed between the parties regarding the disputed property, despite allegations of mortgage fraud. The matter was adjourned for six weeks as a contested application, with petitioners directed to serve copies on opposite parties and the State ordered to produce the case diary at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Kausik Chanda

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/1875/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRR 1875 of 2026 The court stayed proceedings in the underlying criminal case (G.R. Case No. 1459 of 2022) for 12 weeks, finding prima facie evidence of a valid sale deed between the parties regarding the disputed property, despite allegations of mortgage fraud. The matter was adjourned for six weeks as a contested application, with petitioners directed to serve copies on opposite parties and the State ordered to produce the case diary at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case