SK. QUDRATULLAH @ KUDRATULLAH AND ANR. MONALISHA SINHA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/10696/2026

Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 19th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 19-May-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0201122026

Filing Number

WPA/10331/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPA/10696/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

POLICE INACTION/ACTION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

19-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

No Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SK. QUDRATULLAH @ KUDRATULLAH AND ANR. MONALISHA SINHA

  2. 2.SK. WALIULLAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

  2. 2.SECY. OF THE DEPT. OF HOME AFFAIRS

  3. 3.THE COMM. OF POLICE, HOWRAH

  4. 4.THE O.C., GOLABARI P.S.

  5. 5.SAKILA KHATUN

  6. 6.SAHID AHMED

  7. 7.GURIA

  8. 8.SARIK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Saugata BhattacharyyaView PDF

    The Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking directions to register an FIR based on the petitioners' complaint, finding that the underlying dispute pertained to tenancy matters. The court held that an alternative remedy was available to the petitioners under Section 175(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate, and therefore declined to entertain the petition on the grounds of availability of alternative remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-May-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/10696/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking directions to register an FIR based on the petitioners' complaint, finding that the underlying dispute pertained to tenancy matters. The court held that an alternative remedy was available to the petitioners under Section 175(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate, and therefore declined to entertain the petition on the grounds of availability of alternative remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case