DEEPAK KUMAR SANGAI MRITYUNJOY CHATTERJEE vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — CRR/1868/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 442/528. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: WBCHCA0200992026

Filing Number

CRR/1852/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRR/1868/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Exercise of inherent power u/s 482 Cr. P. C. ( 40 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 442/528
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,2023 Section 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/316(2)/351(2)/348/61(2)/3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEEPAK KUMAR SANGAI MRITYUNJOY CHATTERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

  2. 2.PANKAJ GUPTA

  3. 3.MAHESH PRASAD GUPTA

  4. 4.ASHA GUPTA

  5. 5.SANJAY GUPTA

  6. 6.SHALU GUPTA

  7. 7.DIVYA GUPTA

  8. 8.RAMESH RAO

  9. 9.RAJ KR. CHOUDHURY

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Kausik ChandaView PDF

    The court granted a 12-week stay of all proceedings in G.R. Case No. 4780 of 2025 (Shibpur Police Station), finding that the Magistrate's rejection of the petitioner's "Narazi" petition failed to consider the primary grievance regarding non-seizure of CCTV footage during investigation. The case is scheduled for contested hearing after six weeks, with the petitioner required to serve copies on opposite parties and file an affidavit of service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Kausik Chanda

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/1868/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted a 12-week stay of all proceedings in G.R. Case No. 4780 of 2025 (Shibpur Police Station), finding that the Magistrate's rejection of the petitioner's "Narazi" petition failed to consider the primary grievance regarding non-seizure of CCTV footage during investigation. The case is scheduled for contested hearing after six weeks, with the petitioner required to serve copies on opposite parties and file an affidavit of service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case