SATYENDRANATH DAS AND ORS. DILIP KUMAR SINHA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA(P)/219/2026

Case under West Bengal Highways Act ,1964 Section NA. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: WBCHCA0200912026

Filing Number

WPA(P)/221/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPA(P)/219/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Sen

Coram

Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Sen

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Public Interest Litigation ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Highways Act ,1964 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATYENDRANATH DAS AND ORS. DILIP KUMAR SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul,hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi SenView PDF

    Case Summary: WPA(P) 219/2026 The petition filed by Satyendranath Das and others against the State of West Bengal was adjourned on May 8, 2026. Respondents 8-12 were granted two weeks to file an affidavit-in-opposition, with petitioners allowed two weeks thereafter to file an affidavit-in-reply. The matter was listed for further hearing, and petitioners' counsel was directed to serve the order on the Legal Remembrancer's office with a receipted copy to be filed on the adjourned date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Pil

    Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Sen

  4. 07-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA(P)/219/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA(P) 219/2026 The petition filed by Satyendranath Das and others against the State of West Bengal was adjourned on May 8, 2026. Respondents 8-12 were granted two weeks to file an affidavit-in-opposition, with petitioners allowed two weeks thereafter to file an affidavit-in-reply. The matter was listed for further hearing, and petitioners' counsel was directed to serve the order on the Legal Remembrancer's office with a receipted copy to be filed on the adjourned date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case