NARAYAN MAITY AND ORS. TITHI PAUL vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA(P)/216/2026

Case under Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0200902026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

07th May 2026

Filing Number

WPA(P)/220/2026

Filing Date

28-04-2026

Registration No

WPA(P)/216/2026

Registration Date

28-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL , HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN

Coram

HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL , HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Public Interest Litigation ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

NARAYAN MAITY AND ORS. TITHI PAUL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL , HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN

07-05-2026

NEW MOTION

08-05-2026

PIL

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL,HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN

Summary of WPA(P) 216/2026 The West Bengal High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing petitioners Narayan Maity and others to submit a fresh comprehensive representation to respondent authority no.4 regarding removal of a wooden bridge and damage to the approach road to a local cremation ground. The court mandated that respondent no.4 conduct a hearing with all stakeholders and issue a reasoned order within 90 working days, with directions to take immediate action if the petitioners' grievances are found justified, while expressly keeping all merits open for the authority's determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WPA(P) 216/2026 The West Bengal High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing petitioners Narayan Maity and others to submit a fresh comprehensive representation to respondent authority no.4 regarding removal of a wooden bridge and damage to the approach road to a local cremation ground. The court mandated that respondent no.4 conduct a hearing with all stakeholders and issue a reasoned order within 90 working days, with directions to take immediate action if the petitioners' grievances are found justified, while expressly keeping all merits open for the authority's determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case