NARAYAN MAITY AND ORS. TITHI PAUL vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA(P)/216/2026
Case under Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0200902026
Filing Number
WPA(P)/220/2026
Filing Date
28-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPA(P)/216/2026
Registration Date
28-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Sen
Coram
Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Sen
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Public Interest Litigation ( 21 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NARAYAN MAITY AND ORS. TITHI PAUL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul,hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi SenView PDF
Summary of WPA(P) 216/2026 The West Bengal High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing petitioners Narayan Maity and others to submit a fresh comprehensive representation to respondent authority no.4 regarding removal of a wooden bridge and damage to the approach road to a local cremation ground. The court mandated that respondent no.4 conduct a hearing with all stakeholders and issue a reasoned order within 90 working days, with directions to take immediate action if the petitioners' grievances are found justified, while expressly keeping all merits open for the authority's determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Pil
Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Sen
-
07-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA(P)/216/2026
Summary of WPA(P) 216/2026 The West Bengal High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing petitioners Narayan Maity and others to submit a fresh comprehensive representation to respondent authority no.4 regarding removal of a wooden bridge and damage to the approach road to a local cremation ground. The court mandated that respondent no.4 conduct a hearing with all stakeholders and issue a reasoned order within 90 working days, with directions to take immediate action if the petitioners' grievances are found justified, while expressly keeping all merits open for the authority's determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts