GARDEN REACH CONTRACT SECURITY AND LABOUR UNION SUVADIP BHATTACHARJEE vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — WPA/10469/2026

Case under Industrial Disputes Act ,1947 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0200572026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

06th May 2026

Filing Number

WPA/10303/2026

Filing Date

28-04-2026

Registration No

WPA/10469/2026

Registration Date

30-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act ,1947 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

GARDEN REACH CONTRACT SECURITY AND LABOUR UNION SUVADIP BHATTACHARJEE

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)

06-05-2026

NEW MOTION

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)

Case Summary: The court disposed of the writ petition by directing Respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 26.02.2026 (which remained pending) within 60 days after hearing all stakeholders and passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. The court found merit in the petitioner's prayer regarding the unexplained delay in processing the representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The court disposed of the writ petition by directing Respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 26.02.2026 (which remained pending) within 60 days after hearing all stakeholders and passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. The court found merit in the petitioner's prayer regarding the unexplained delay in processing the representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case