SANJIT BISWAS GIASUL ISLAM vs RANJAN DAS, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (CIVIL), BUILDING DEPARTMENT — CPAN/594/2026

Case under Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act ,1980 Section NA. Next hearing: 13th August 2026.

Next hearing 13-Aug-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0200552026

Filing Number

CPAN/604/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

CPAN/594/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Civil Contempt ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act ,1980 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJIT BISWAS GIASUL ISLAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RANJAN DAS, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (CIVIL), BUILDING DEPARTMENT

Case History

  1. 13-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Aug-2026

    Application 1

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita SinhaView PDF

    The High Court at Calcutta admitted a contempt petition (CPAN 594/2026) by Sanjit Biswas against Ranjan Das and others, alleging violation of a court direction dated 7th February 2024. The court directed the petitioner to serve the contempt application on the respondents with the matter scheduled for 13th August 2026, while clarifying that pendency of the contempt application would not prevent compliance with the original court direction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 04-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPAN/594/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta admitted a contempt petition (CPAN 594/2026) by Sanjit Biswas against Ranjan Das and others, alleging violation of a court direction dated 7th February 2024. The court directed the petitioner to serve the contempt application on the respondents with the matter scheduled for 13th August 2026, while clarifying that pendency of the contempt application would not prevent compliance with the original court direction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case