RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PRATIK ACHARJEE vs LOPAMUDRA SINGHA ROY AND OTHERS — CRR/1804/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397/401/482. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 18th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0195382026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

07th May 2026

Filing Number

CRR/1785/2026

Filing Date

24-04-2026

Registration No

CRR/1804/2026

Registration Date

24-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE

Coram

HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Residuary matters ( 93 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

18th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397/401/482
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438/442/528
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act ,2005 Section 29

Petitioner(s)

RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PRATIK ACHARJEE

Respondent(s)

LOPAMUDRA SINGHA ROY AND OTHERS

PARIMAL SINGHA ROY

STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE

07-05-2026

NEW MOTION

15-05-2026

NEW MOTION 2

14-05-2026

NEW MOTION 2

13-05-2026

NEW MOTION 2

12-05-2026

NEW MOTION 1

Orders

22-05-2026
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE

The court issued a corrigendum to its earlier order dated 18.5.2026, correcting three inadvertent drafting errors: removing references to the Domestic Violence Act, replacing "appeal was preferred against" with "In the", and changing "unauthorised detention" to "unauthorised retention". All corrections were incorporated into the original order while keeping other portions unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court issued a corrigendum to its earlier order dated 18.5.2026, correcting three inadvertent drafting errors: removing references to the Domestic Violence Act, replacing "appeal was preferred against" with "In the", and changing "unauthorised detention" to "unauthorised retention". All corrections were incorporated into the original order while keeping other portions unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case