RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PRATIK ACHARJEE vs LOPAMUDRA SINGHA ROY AND OTHERS — CRR/1804/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397/401/482. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 18th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0195382026
Next Hearing
07th May 2026
Filing Number
CRR/1785/2026
Filing Date
24-04-2026
Registration No
CRR/1804/2026
Registration Date
24-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE
Coram
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Residuary matters ( 93 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
18th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PRATIK ACHARJEE
Respondent(s)
LOPAMUDRA SINGHA ROY AND OTHERS
PARIMAL SINGHA ROY
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE
NEW MOTION
NEW MOTION 2
NEW MOTION 2
NEW MOTION 2
NEW MOTION 1
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 15-05-2026 | NEW MOTION 2 |
| 14-05-2026 | NEW MOTION 2 |
| 13-05-2026 | NEW MOTION 2 |
| 12-05-2026 | NEW MOTION 1 |
Orders
The court issued a corrigendum to its earlier order dated 18.5.2026, correcting three inadvertent drafting errors: removing references to the Domestic Violence Act, replacing "appeal was preferred against" with "In the", and changing "unauthorised detention" to "unauthorised retention". All corrections were incorporated into the original order while keeping other portions unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court issued a corrigendum to its earlier order dated 18.5.2026, correcting three inadvertent drafting errors: removing references to the Domestic Violence Act, replacing "appeal was preferred against" with "In the", and changing "unauthorised detention" to "unauthorised retention". All corrections were incorporated into the original order while keeping other portions unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts