DIGAMBAR BEHERA vs THE MANAGING DIRECTOR AND C.E.O., BANK OF BARODA, HEAD OFFICE BARODA CORPORATE CENTRE AND OTHERS — MAT/764/2026

Case under No Act Section NA. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0195082026

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

MAT/771/2026

Filing Date

23-04-2026

Registration No

MAT/764/2026

Registration Date

24-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD , HON'BLE JUSTICE PRASENJIT BISWAS

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD , HON'BLE JUSTICE PRASENJIT BISWAS

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Residuary ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Acts & Sections

No Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

DIGAMBAR BEHERA

Respondent(s)

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR AND C.E.O., BANK OF BARODA, HEAD OFFICE BARODA CORPORATE CENTRE AND OTHERS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD , HON'BLE JUSTICE PRASENJIT BISWAS

04-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION

10-06-2026

GROUP - VI

Orders

19-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD,HON'BLE JUSTICE PRASENJIT BISWAS

Summary of MAT/764/2026 Digambar Behera appealed against a Single Judge's order regarding his promotion at Bank of Baroda. He claims the bank wrongfully withheld his promotion to D.G.M Scale VI despite a 2015 DPC finding him fit for Scale V promotion. The appellant argued the Single Judge failed to address his consequential entitlement to Scale VI promotion. The court adjourned the matter to 10th June 2026, directing the appellant to produce relevant service rules and respondents to be served notice, to determine qualification requirements and the effect of a 2016 punishment on his promotion eligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of MAT/764/2026 Digambar Behera appealed against a Single Judge's order regarding his promotion at Bank of Baroda. He claims the bank wrongfully withheld his promotion to D.G.M Scale VI despite a 2015 DPC finding him fit for Scale V promotion. The appellant argued the Single Judge failed to address his consequential entitlement to Scale VI promotion. The court adjourned the matter to 10th June 2026, directing the appellant to produce relevant service rules and respondents to be served notice, to determine qualification requirements and the effect of a 2016 punishment on his promotion eligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case