N. RAMA RAO AND ANR. KAUSTAV BHATTACHARYA vs SAROBALA BAG AND ORS. — FMAT/142/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section NA. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0194012026

Filing Number

FMAT/145/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

FMAT/142/2026

Registration Date

23-Apr-2026

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.N. RAMA RAO AND ANR. KAUSTAV BHATTACHARYA

  2. 2.K. KALESWAR RAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAROBALA BAG AND ORS.

  2. 2.DHIRAJ BAG

  3. 3.SHASHTHI MALIK

  4. 4.MANGALA MANNA

  5. 5.ANITA MANNA

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Order XLI Rule 11

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Biswaroop Chowdhury

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Biswaroop ChowdhuryView PDF

    FMAT 142/2026 Summary: The court GRANTED ad-interim injunction to the appellants (N. Rama Rao and others) in their specific performance suit against Sarobala Bag and others. The lower court's refusal of injunction was reversed, finding a strong prima facie case based on the signed agreement and money receipt despite the document being notarized rather than registered. The court restrained respondents from transferring or alienating the subject property pending final hearing in June 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. FMAT/142/2026

casestatus.in Summary

FMAT 142/2026 Summary: The court GRANTED ad-interim injunction to the appellants (N. Rama Rao and others) in their specific performance suit against Sarobala Bag and others. The lower court's refusal of injunction was reversed, finding a strong prima facie case based on the signed agreement and money receipt despite the document being notarized rather than registered. The court restrained respondents from transferring or alienating the subject property pending final hearing in June 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case