PRATIMA SAHA AND ORS SUDARSAN HALDER vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/10149/2026

Case under West Bengal Municipal Act ,1973 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 18th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0193902026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

07th May 2026

Filing Number

WPA/9990/2026

Filing Date

23-04-2026

Registration No

WPA/10149/2026

Registration Date

23-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

18th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Municipal Act ,1973 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

PRATIMA SAHA AND ORS SUDARSAN HALDER

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY

07-05-2026

NEW MOTION

18-05-2026

NEW MOTION - 7

07-05-2026

NEW MOTION - 7

Orders

18-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY

Case Summary: WPA 10149/2026 Court Decision: The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition challenging the municipal record alteration, though acknowledging the procedure violated natural justice principles. However, the court declined to intervene because the underlying property deed is already under challenge in a civil suit (Title Suit No. 272 of 2014) and no interim relief has been granted in that suit. Key Facts & Reasoning: Petitioners challenged the municipality's change of assessee name from the deceased original owner (Maya Debi) to Respondent No. 7, based on a sale deed dated August 1, 2012. The court found that since the deed's validity is pending judicial determination in civil court, this was the appropriate forum to resolve the ownership dispute, not the writ petition. The court reserved liberty for petitioners to seek relief if they succeed in the civil suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA 10149/2026 Court Decision: The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition challenging the municipal record alteration, though acknowledging the procedure violated natural justice principles. However, the court declined to intervene because the underlying property deed is already under challenge in a civil suit (Title Suit No. 272 of 2014) and no interim relief has been granted in that suit. Key Facts & Reasoning: Petitioners challenged the municipality's change of assessee name from the deceased original owner (Maya Debi) to Respondent No. 7, based on a sale deed dated August 1, 2012. The court found that since the deed's validity is pending judicial determination in civil court, this was the appropriate forum to resolve the ownership dispute, not the writ petition. The court reserved liberty for petitioners to seek relief if they succeed in the civil suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case