PRATIMA SAHA AND ORS SUDARSAN HALDER vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/10149/2026
Case under West Bengal Municipal Act ,1973 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 18th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0193902026
Next Hearing
07th May 2026
Filing Number
WPA/9990/2026
Filing Date
23-04-2026
Registration No
WPA/10149/2026
Registration Date
23-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 12 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
18th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRATIMA SAHA AND ORS SUDARSAN HALDER
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY
NEW MOTION
NEW MOTION - 7
NEW MOTION - 7
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 18-05-2026 | NEW MOTION - 7 |
| 07-05-2026 | NEW MOTION - 7 |
Orders
Case Summary: WPA 10149/2026 Court Decision: The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition challenging the municipal record alteration, though acknowledging the procedure violated natural justice principles. However, the court declined to intervene because the underlying property deed is already under challenge in a civil suit (Title Suit No. 272 of 2014) and no interim relief has been granted in that suit. Key Facts & Reasoning: Petitioners challenged the municipality's change of assessee name from the deceased original owner (Maya Debi) to Respondent No. 7, based on a sale deed dated August 1, 2012. The court found that since the deed's validity is pending judicial determination in civil court, this was the appropriate forum to resolve the ownership dispute, not the writ petition. The court reserved liberty for petitioners to seek relief if they succeed in the civil suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPA 10149/2026 Court Decision: The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition challenging the municipal record alteration, though acknowledging the procedure violated natural justice principles. However, the court declined to intervene because the underlying property deed is already under challenge in a civil suit (Title Suit No. 272 of 2014) and no interim relief has been granted in that suit. Key Facts & Reasoning: Petitioners challenged the municipality's change of assessee name from the deceased original owner (Maya Debi) to Respondent No. 7, based on a sale deed dated August 1, 2012. The court found that since the deed's validity is pending judicial determination in civil court, this was the appropriate forum to resolve the ownership dispute, not the writ petition. The court reserved liberty for petitioners to seek relief if they succeed in the civil suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts