PURNIMA JANA SABITA KHUTIA (BHUNYA) vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — MAT/779/2026

Case under No Act Section NA. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0192732026

Filing Number

MAT/762/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

MAT/779/2026

Registration Date

27-Apr-2026

Judge

LD. Registrar Admn. (L and Om)

Coram

LD. Registrar Admn. (L and Om)

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PURNIMA JANA SABITA KHUTIA (BHUNYA)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

  2. 2.THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, WBSEDCL

  3. 3.THE DIRECTOR (FINANCE) WBSEDCL

  4. 4.S. K. GUPTA

  5. 5.THE MANAGER (FNA) PENSION CELL, WBSEDCL

  6. 6.THE ASSISTANT MANAGER, (F AND A), CORPORATION PENSION CELL, WBSEDCL

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    LD. Registrar Admn. (L and Om)View PDF

    In MAT-779/2026, the High Court at Calcutta heard the petition of Purnima Jana against the State of West Bengal on 18.06.2026. Since no parties appeared, the court directed the appellant's advocate to take appropriate steps as per an office note dated 17.06.2026 within two weeks. The case was adjourned pending compliance with these directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Group - V

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar , Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

  4. 06-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAT/779/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In MAT-779/2026, the High Court at Calcutta heard the petition of Purnima Jana against the State of West Bengal on 18.06.2026. Since no parties appeared, the court directed the appellant's advocate to take appropriate steps as per an office note dated 17.06.2026 within two weeks. The case was adjourned pending compliance with these directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case