HEMANT KR. AGARWAL BIDYUT KR. HALDER vs C.E.S.C. LIMITED — WPA/8869/2005

Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: WBCHCA0192622005

Filing Number

WPA/19262/2005

Filing Date

26-Apr-2005

Registration No

WPA/8869/2005

Registration Date

26-Apr-2005

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Connection/Disconnection ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HEMANT KR. AGARWAL BIDYUT KR. HALDER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.C.E.S.C. LIMITED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

    WPA 8869/2005 was dismissed for default on June 16, 2026, as neither party appeared despite proper notice and the matter being listed for hearing. The court found that case records were untraceable in all available registers and systems, and no adjournment was sought, warranting dismissal for default with vacation of any interim orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Old Matter

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Old Matter 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  5. 12-Jun-2026

    Old Matter 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  6. 11-Jun-2026

    Old Matter 1

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  7. 10-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 26-Apr-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/8869/2005

casestatus.in Summary

WPA 8869/2005 was dismissed for default on June 16, 2026, as neither party appeared despite proper notice and the matter being listed for hearing. The court found that case records were untraceable in all available registers and systems, and no adjournment was sought, warranting dismissal for default with vacation of any interim orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case