RAJ KUMAR GUPTA AND ANR ANANYA ADHIKARY vs BISWAJIT GHOSH AND ORS — MAT/704/2024

Case under Sarfaesi Act ,2002 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-Apr-2024

CNR: WBCHCA0191862024

Filing Number

MAT/716/2024

Filing Date

09-Apr-2024

Registration No

MAT/704/2024

Registration Date

09-Apr-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar , Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar , Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Residuary ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Sarfaesi Act ,2002 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJ KUMAR GUPTA AND ANR ANANYA ADHIKARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BISWAJIT GHOSH AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar,hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar GuptaView PDF

    The appeal of Raj Kumar Gupta & Anr. against Biswajit Ghosh & Ors. was dismissed for non-compliance on June 16, 2026. Although the court had previously granted the appellants an opportunity (June 8, 2026) to cure a procedural defect, they failed to do so and none appeared for them. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Application (Gr - IX)

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar , Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar,hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar GuptaView PDF

  5. 22-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAT/704/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The appeal of Raj Kumar Gupta & Anr. against Biswajit Ghosh & Ors. was dismissed for non-compliance on June 16, 2026. Although the court had previously granted the appellants an opportunity (June 8, 2026) to cure a procedural defect, they failed to do so and none appeared for them. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case