SABINA BIBI TORSA MIN BAHAR vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/10119/2026

Case under No Act Section NA. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0191792026

Filing Number

WPA/9879/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPA/10119/2026

Registration Date

23-Apr-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

POLICE INACTION/ACTION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SABINA BIBI TORSA MIN BAHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

  2. 2.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

  3. 3.SP OF POLICE BASIRHAT POLICE DISTRICT

  4. 4.OFFICER IN CHARGE BADURIA POLICE STATION

  5. 5.MOMREJ MONDAL

  6. 6.GOLAM NABI MONDAL

  7. 7.MOSTAFA MONDAL

  8. 8.AL AMIN MONDAL

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya

  3. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Saugata BhattacharyyaView PDF

    Case Summary: WPA 10119/2026 The High Court at Calcutta adjourned the petition filed by Sabina Bibi against the State of West Bengal and others. The matter was listed under "Motion" in the Monthly Combined List of June 2026 for next hearing. The petitioner's advocate was directed to complete service of notice on the respondents and file an affidavit of service, as respondents were not represented at the time of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/10119/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA 10119/2026 The High Court at Calcutta adjourned the petition filed by Sabina Bibi against the State of West Bengal and others. The matter was listed under "Motion" in the Monthly Combined List of June 2026 for next hearing. The petitioner's advocate was directed to complete service of notice on the respondents and file an affidavit of service, as respondents were not represented at the time of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case