SAID MALLICK SAIKAT CHATTERJEE vs WEST BENGLA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED AND ORS. — WPA/10071/2026

Case under West Bengal Electricity Act ,2003 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-May-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0191432026

Filing Number

WPA/9862/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPA/10071/2026

Registration Date

23-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Connection/Disconnection ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Electricity Act ,2003 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAID MALLICK SAIKAT CHATTERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.WEST BENGLA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED AND ORS.

  2. 2.THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER PAIKER CUSTOMER CARE CENTRE

  3. 3.THE STATION MANAGER PAIKER CUSTOMER CENTRE

  4. 4.ABDUL HALIM SHEIKH

  5. 5.MILAN SHEIKH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

    The court disposed of the petition by directing West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (WBSEDCL) to respond to the petitioner's representation dated 25th February 2026 within one month. The court made clear that no merits-based adjudication was conducted, leaving all substantive questions for WBSEDCL to decide in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/10071/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the petition by directing West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (WBSEDCL) to respond to the petitioner's representation dated 25th February 2026 within one month. The court made clear that no merits-based adjudication was conducted, leaving all substantive questions for WBSEDCL to decide in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case