RAJ KUMAR GHOSH @ RAJU SOURAT GHOSH vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR/1803/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 447(2)/528. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: WBCHCA0190932026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

CRR/1750/2026

Filing Date

22-04-2026

Registration No

CRR/1803/2026

Registration Date

24-04-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Quashing of Proceedings ( 75 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 447(2)/528
Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482/407(2)
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,2023 Section 115(2)/351(2)/352

Petitioner(s)

RAJ KUMAR GHOSH @ RAJU SOURAT GHOSH

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

ASHOK KUMAR DAS

Hearing History

28-04-2026

NEW MOTION

08-05-2026

NEW MOTION

07-05-2026

NEW MOTION

06-05-2026

NEW MOTION

05-05-2026

NEW MOTION

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE KAUSIK CHANDA

Case Summary: CRR 1803/2026 Outcome: The court granted a six-week stay of proceedings on the complaint case and adjourned the matter for hearing after three weeks. Petitioner Raj Kumar Ghosh sought transfer of the case from 1st Judicial Magistrate, Tamluk to Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghatal, citing difficulties in contesting due to the opposing party being a local Bar Association member. The court ordered service of the application on opposite parties and required the petitioner to file an affidavit of service at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRR 1803/2026 Outcome: The court granted a six-week stay of proceedings on the complaint case and adjourned the matter for hearing after three weeks. Petitioner Raj Kumar Ghosh sought transfer of the case from 1st Judicial Magistrate, Tamluk to Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghatal, citing difficulties in contesting due to the opposing party being a local Bar Association member. The court ordered service of the application on opposite parties and required the petitioner to file an affidavit of service at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case