MESSRS. MINING ASSOCIATES CHIRANJIB SINHA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/9886/2026
Case under Land Reforms ,1955 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0189952026
Filing Number
WPA/9794/2026
Filing Date
21-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPA/9886/2026
Registration Date
21-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MESSRS. MINING ASSOCIATES CHIRANJIB SINHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay BhattacharyyaView PDF
Case Summary: WPA/9886/2026 Court Decision: The Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ petition but granted the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate authority through the proper legal remedy. The court held that WBSETCL's construction of 220 KV transmission towers on the petitioner's agricultural land in Paschim Bardhaman is governed by the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 (Part-III), not the 2023 Telecommunications Act, due to a saving clause in the 2023 Act. Since the petitioner disputes the adequacy of the crop compensation of Rs. 3,45,762/-, the court directed the petitioner to pursue relief under Section 16(3) of the 1885 Act by approaching the District Judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya
-
21-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/9886/2026
Case Summary: WPA/9886/2026 Court Decision: The Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ petition but granted the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate authority through the proper legal remedy. The court held that WBSETCL's construction of 220 KV transmission towers on the petitioner's agricultural land in Paschim Bardhaman is governed by the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 (Part-III), not the 2023 Telecommunications Act, due to a saving clause in the 2023 Act. Since the petitioner disputes the adequacy of the crop compensation of Rs. 3,45,762/-, the court directed the petitioner to pursue relief under Section 16(3) of the 1885 Act by approaching the District Judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts