KAWASAR ALI MOLLA PAMPA DEY (DHABAL) vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/9487/2026

Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0183132026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

27th April 2026

Filing Number

WPA/9439/2026

Filing Date

17-04-2026

Registration No

WPA/9487/2026

Registration Date

17-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

POLICE INACTION/ACTION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

No Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

KAWASAR ALI MOLLA PAMPA DEY (DHABAL)

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

27-04-2026

NEW MOTION

08-05-2026

NEW MOTION

07-05-2026

NEW MOTION

30-04-2026

NEW MOTION

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

Case Summary: WPA 9487/2026 The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition filed by Kawsar Ali Molla seeking direction to police to register an FIR based on his complaint. The court held that an alternative remedy exists under Section 175(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, allowing the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate, making writ petition inappropriate. However, the dismissal does not bar the petitioner from pursuing the Magistrate remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA 9487/2026 The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition filed by Kawsar Ali Molla seeking direction to police to register an FIR based on his complaint. The court held that an alternative remedy exists under Section 175(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, allowing the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate, making writ petition inappropriate. However, the dismissal does not bar the petitioner from pursuing the Magistrate remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case