MINARUL ISLAM AND ORS. MASOOQ RAHMAN vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/9488/2026

Case under West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0181682026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

24th April 2026

Filing Number

WPA/9367/2026

Filing Date

17-04-2026

Registration No

WPA/9488/2026

Registration Date

17-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SUVRA GHOSH

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SUVRA GHOSH

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

MINARUL ISLAM AND ORS. MASOOQ RAHMAN

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SUVRA GHOSH

24-04-2026

NEW MOTION

05-05-2026

MOTION

30-04-2026

MOTION

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SUVRA GHOSH

The court granted the petitioners' writ petition challenging the prescribed authority's failure to act on their no-confidence motion against the Pradhan within the statutory timeframe under Section 12 of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973. Although the statutory period had expired, the court held that the time limit is directory rather than mandatory (as non-compliance entails no penalty) and directed the authority to restart the procedure, treating the requisition notice submission date as the date of order communication, to be completed strictly per Section 12 of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the petitioners' writ petition challenging the prescribed authority's failure to act on their no-confidence motion against the Pradhan within the statutory timeframe under Section 12 of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973. Although the statutory period had expired, the court held that the time limit is directory rather than mandatory (as non-compliance entails no penalty) and directed the authority to restart the procedure, treating the requisition notice submission date as the date of order communication, to be completed strictly per Section 12 of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case