SWAPNA DAS ARPAN MONDAL vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/9503/2026
Case under Police Act ,1861 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 18th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0181392026
Filing Number
WPA/9349/2026
Filing Date
17-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPA/9503/2026
Registration Date
17-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
POLICE INACTION/ACTION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SWAPNA DAS ARPAN MONDAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Saugata BhattacharyyaView PDF
Case Summary: WPA 9503/2026 The High Court at Calcutta dismissed Swapna Das's writ petition seeking police intervention in a property sale dispute. The dispute arose over a ₹40 lakh property sale agreement where the private respondent refused to pay the full amount, insisting on paying ₹3 lakh less. The court held that the matter was civil in nature and that police authorities lack jurisdiction to adjudicate contractual disputes. The petitioner was directed to approach the civil court for appropriate remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya
-
11-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Saugata BhattacharyyaView PDF
-
11-Jun-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya
-
20-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Saugata BhattacharyyaView PDF
-
20-May-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya
-
07-May-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya
-
30-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/9503/2026
Case Summary: WPA 9503/2026 The High Court at Calcutta dismissed Swapna Das's writ petition seeking police intervention in a property sale dispute. The dispute arose over a ₹40 lakh property sale agreement where the private respondent refused to pay the full amount, insisting on paying ₹3 lakh less. The court held that the matter was civil in nature and that police authorities lack jurisdiction to adjudicate contractual disputes. The petitioner was directed to approach the civil court for appropriate remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts