PALLABI SAHA @ RONG INDRANIL HALDER vs UNION OF INDIA AND ANR — WPA/9234/2026

Case under Societies Registration Act ,1961 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0177602026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

17th April 2026

Filing Number

WPA/9147/2026

Filing Date

13-04-2026

Registration No

WPA/9234/2026

Registration Date

13-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

In Service Others 87 ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Societies Registration Act ,1961 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

PALLABI SAHA @ RONG INDRANIL HALDER

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR

THE PRINCIPAL, KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK

17-04-2026

NEW MOTION

08-05-2026

MOTION 4

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK

Case Summary: WPA 9234/2026 The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition filed by Pallabi Saha seeking immediate admission of her son to Kendriya Vidyalaya, Vijay Durg under the Scheduled Caste category. The court found that the school had already considered the boy's application under SC category and placed him at Wait List No. 43 on the provisional merit list, contrary to the petitioner's claim that his candidature was rejected for lack of an SC certificate. Since the application was properly considered and processed according to relevant norms allocating 15% SC seats, the court held the petition lacked merit and dismissed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA 9234/2026 The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition filed by Pallabi Saha seeking immediate admission of her son to Kendriya Vidyalaya, Vijay Durg under the Scheduled Caste category. The court found that the school had already considered the boy's application under SC category and placed him at Wait List No. 43 on the provisional merit list, contrary to the petitioner's claim that his candidature was rejected for lack of an SC certificate. Since the application was properly considered and processed according to relevant norms allocating 15% SC seats, the court held the petition lacked merit and dismissed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case