PALLABI SAHA @ RONG INDRANIL HALDER vs UNION OF INDIA AND ANR — WPA/9234/2026
Case under Societies Registration Act ,1961 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0177602026
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
Filing Number
WPA/9147/2026
Filing Date
13-04-2026
Registration No
WPA/9234/2026
Registration Date
13-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
In Service Others 87 ( 9 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PALLABI SAHA @ RONG INDRANIL HALDER
Respondent(s)
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR
THE PRINCIPAL, KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK
NEW MOTION
MOTION 4
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 08-05-2026 | MOTION 4 |
Orders
Case Summary: WPA 9234/2026 The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition filed by Pallabi Saha seeking immediate admission of her son to Kendriya Vidyalaya, Vijay Durg under the Scheduled Caste category. The court found that the school had already considered the boy's application under SC category and placed him at Wait List No. 43 on the provisional merit list, contrary to the petitioner's claim that his candidature was rejected for lack of an SC certificate. Since the application was properly considered and processed according to relevant norms allocating 15% SC seats, the court held the petition lacked merit and dismissed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPA 9234/2026 The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition filed by Pallabi Saha seeking immediate admission of her son to Kendriya Vidyalaya, Vijay Durg under the Scheduled Caste category. The court found that the school had already considered the boy's application under SC category and placed him at Wait List No. 43 on the provisional merit list, contrary to the petitioner's claim that his candidature was rejected for lack of an SC certificate. Since the application was properly considered and processed according to relevant norms allocating 15% SC seats, the court held the petition lacked merit and dismissed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts